- T21C: Earthquake Interaction and Static and Dynamic Coulomb Stress Triggering II Poster
-
NOLA CC
Primary Convener:Generic 'disconnected' Message
Ross Stein, Temblor, Inc.
Convener:
Shinji Toda, Tohoku University
Jian Lin, Southern University of Science and Technology
Volkan Sevilgen, Temblor, Inc.
Chris Rollins, GNS Science
Early Career Convener:
Chris Rollins, GNS Science
Chair:
Shinji Toda, Tohoku University
Ross Stein, Temblor, Inc.
Chris Rollins, GNS Science
Volkan Sevilgen, Temblor, Inc.
In the past 15 years, numerous large earthquakes have struck in progressive sequences, with time spans ranging from minutes to decades, and earthquakes separated by a few km to hundreds of km. Examples include the 2009 M 7.7, 7.8, and 7.4 Vanuatu, 2011 M 9.1 and M 7.9 Tohoku, 2012 M 8.6 and M 8.2 Wharton Basin, 2019 M 6.4 and M 7.1 Ridgecrest, 2023 M 7.8 and M 7.7 Kahramanmaras earthquakes. In addition, the 2012 M 8.6 Wharton Basin shock triggered worldwide aftershocks, a phenomenon that can only be explained by dynamic triggering imparted by surface waves. Efforts to understand and forecast these occurrences have rapidly evolved, with attempts to capture the interaction and decays by Coulomb stress changes, rate/state friction, aftershock (ETAS) statistics, and fluid diffusion. This session welcomes analyses of such interactions, as well as testable forecasts of earthquake occurrence, and software tools to investigate these processes.
Index Terms
7209 Earthquake dynamics
7223 Earthquake interaction, forecasting, and prediction
8118 Dynamics and mechanics of faulting
8164 Stresses: crust and lithosphere
Cross-Listed:
S - Seismology
G - Geodesy
NH - Natural Hazards
Neighborhoods:
1. Science Nexus
2. Earth Interior
Co-Organized Sessions:
Seismology
Geodesy
Science and Society
Natural Hazards
Suggested Itineraries:
Disasters‚ Calamities and Extreme Events
Global Impacts‚ Solutions‚ & Policies
Scientific DisciplineSuggested ItinerariesNeighborhoodType
Enter Note
Go to previous page in this tab
Session


